How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH4205 vs Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

Philips TAH4205 vs Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

What TAH4205 does better (1) and where Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH4205
Philips · 2020TAH4205
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is TAH4205 better than Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones?

  1. Battery life29 h vs 22 h+32%

Why is Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones better than TAH4205?

Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—30 Ω
Sensitivity110 dB126 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life29 h22 h
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight150 g—
FoldableYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare