vs
Why is TAE1209BK/00 better than QCY-T13?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Driver size8.6 mm vs 7.2 mm+19%
Why is QCY-T13 better than TAE1209BK/00?
QCY-T13 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8.6 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 105 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Colours | White, Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
