vs
Why is TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W better than S65K?
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is S65K better than TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W?
- Channel count3.1 vs 5.1+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 380 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 3.1.2 | 5.1 |
| Channel count | 3.1 | 5.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Lowest frequency | 35 Hz | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Design & build | ||
| Width | — | 850 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | — | unter dem Fernseher, im Regal |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsJVC TH-E754Bvs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XUvs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsSamsung Q800H 5.1.2-Kanal Dolby Atmos Soundbarvs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-Soundbarvs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsULTIMEA SKYWAVE X40
vs
Samsung HW-Q600H/ENvsTCL S65K