vs
8.0Sound8.3
Why is TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W better than A65K?
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is A65K better than TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W?
- Output power380 W vs 460 W+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 380 W | 460 W |
| Speaker channels | 3.1.2 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Lowest frequency | 35 Hz | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| DTS:X | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,150 g |
| Width | — | 880 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsULTIMEA Apollo S90 Soundbar 9.1 Kanal Bluetooth
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200W
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsULTIMEA SKYWAVE X40
vs
Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380WvsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-Soundbar
vs
Samsung HW-Q610GH/ZFvsTCL A65K
