How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W vs Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF

Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W vs Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF

What TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W does better (1) and where Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W
1 advantage≈ $360
vs
Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF
Samsung · 2024Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF
6.9Score
0 advantages≈ $360
Higher score
8.0Sound6.7

Why is TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W better than Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF?

  1. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.2+15%

Why is Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF better than TAB8301/10 Soundbar 3.1.2 Bluetooth 380W?

Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power380 W—
Speaker channels3.1.23.1.2
Channel count3.13.1
SubwooferWireless subwoofer includedWireless subwoofer included
Lowest frequency35 Hz—
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Dolby AtmosYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.2
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Chromecast / Google Cast—Yes
Spotify Connect—Yes
Voice assistant—Alexa
Design & build
Weight—1,400 g
Width—1,160 mm
Height—38 mm
Depth—40 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Remote controlYesYes
Placement—vor dem Fernseher
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare