How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAB6309 vs Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN

Philips TAB6309 vs Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN

What TAB6309 does better (0) and where Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAB6309
Philips · 2024TAB6309
0 advantages≈ $360
vs
Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN
Samsung · 2024Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN
6.1Score
1 advantage≈ $380
Higher score
3.9Sound5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

TAB6309Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN
650 × 3581890 × 3840
TAB6309Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XNDifference
Height35 mm38 mm−3 mm
Width650 mm890 mm−240 mm
Depth81 mm40 mm+41 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TAB6309 better than Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN?

TAB6309 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN better than TAB6309?

  1. Channel count2.1 vs 3.1+48%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power140 W—
Speaker channels2.13.1
Channel count2.13.1
SubwooferWireless subwoofer includedWireless subwoofer included
Lowest frequency180 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Dolby AtmosYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
HDMI eARC / ARCYes—
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Chromecast / Google Cast—Yes
Spotify Connect—Yes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Design & build
Weight—1,000 g
Width650 mm890 mm
Height35 mm38 mm
Depth81 mm40 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Remote controlYesYes
Placementan der Wand, im Regalvor dem Fernseher
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare