vs
Why is TAB4208 better than Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos?
TAB4208 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos better than TAB4208?
- Channel count2 vs 3.1+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 60 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 2 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 18,000 Hz | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Voice assistant built in | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Width | 155 mm | — |
| Height | 119 mm | — |
| Depth | 136 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAB4208vsSamsung HW-Q810GD/ZG
vsLG SQM1vsPhilips TAB4208
vsULTIMEA Apollo S60vsPhilips TAB4208
vs
Sonos Arc UltravsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos
vsKlipsch Flexus Core 200vsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos
vsKlipsch flexus Core 100vsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos