How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAA6219BK/00 vs Grom Wireless

Philips TAA6219BK/00 vs Skullcandy Grom Wireless

What TAA6219BK/00 does better (2) and where Grom Wireless wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAA6219BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6219BK/00
2 advantages≈ $40
vs
Skullcandy Grom Wireless
Skullcandy · 2024Grom Wireless
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls4.0

Why is TAA6219BK/00 better than Grom Wireless?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Grom Wireless: No
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%

Why is Grom Wireless better than TAA6219BK/00?

Grom Wireless has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance80 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB113 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Charging time—4 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Protection ratingIP55—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursRed, BlackBlack
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare