vs
5.7Noise control & calls7.2
Why is T2 Fidelio True Wireless better than LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N?
- Driver size9.2 mm vs 5 mm+84%
Why is LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N better than T2 Fidelio True Wireless?
LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9.2 mm | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 7 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 75 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony WF-1000XM5vsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless
vsDenon PerL ProvsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless
vsTechnics EAH-AZ80vsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless
vsTechnics EAH-AZ60M2vsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless
vsHifiMan Svanar wirelessvsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless
vsMarshall Motif II A.N.C.vsPhilips T2 Fidelio True Wireless