Why is RZ-S50W better than TW-E5B?
- Active noise cancellingYes · TW-E5B: No
- Driver size8 mm vs 7 mm+14%
Why is TW-E5B better than RZ-S50W?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · RZ-S50W: Yes
- Battery life7.5 h vs 8 h+7%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- aptXNo · RZ-S50W: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 6.5 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | 7 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | — | 30 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 6.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
