vs
3.0Noise control & calls9.3
Why is Slide TWS Earphones better than TAT2139?
Slide TWS Earphones has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT2139 better than Slide TWS Earphones?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Slide TWS Earphones: Yes
- Total with charging case24 h vs 28 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | — | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 50 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
