vs
7.8Battery7.7
Why is Enco Buds3 better than Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Driver size12.4 mm vs 10 mm+24%
Why is Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT better than Enco Buds3?
- Battery life9 h vs 10 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12.4 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 100 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 120 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 10 h |
| Total with charging case | 48 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.7 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsOPPO Enco Buds3vs
OPPO Enco Buds3vsGuess TWS 4G Metal Logo headphonesvs
OPPO Enco Buds3vsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
OPPO Enco Buds3vsEdifier A6vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsradius Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BTvsradius Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BTvsGuess TWS 4G Metal Logo headphones