How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Enco Buds3 vs TAT2520

OPPO Enco Buds3 vs Philips TAT2520

What Enco Buds3 does better (4) and where TAT2520 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Enco Buds3
OPPO · 2025Enco Buds3
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT2520
Philips · 2025TAT2520
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $20
3.0Noise control & calls5.4
7.8Battery2.3

Why is Enco Buds3 better than TAT2520?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 4 h2.2×
  2. Total with charging case48 h vs 14 h3.4×
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  4. Driver size12.4 mm vs 10 mm+24%

Why is TAT2520 better than Enco Buds3?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Enco Buds3: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Enco Buds3OPPO Enco Buds3≈ $255.4
Philips TAT2520Philips TAT2520≈ $204.6
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12.4 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—107 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h4 h
Battery life with ANC—4 h
Total with charging case48 h14 h
Battery capacity—40 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP55IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare