Why is Enco Air5 better than TAT3000?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
Why is TAT3000 better than Enco Air5?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Enco Air5: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 122 dB | 106 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 13 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 54 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 62 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6.1 | 6 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.3 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
