vs
4.0Noise control & calls7.9
9.3Battery6.7
Why is Studio Wireless C better than HT2?
- Battery life110 h vs 60 h+83%
- Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Why is HT2 better than Studio Wireless C?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Studio Wireless C: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 45,000 Hz2.2×
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 16 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 50 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 16 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 45,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 110 h | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 40 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 500 mAh |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 255 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
