Why is Ear better than AeroClip?
- Total with charging case40 h vs 32 h+27%
- Earbud weight (each)4.8 g vs 5.9 g+23%
Why is AeroClip better than Ear?
- Microphones2 vs 42×
- Driver size11 mm vs 12 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | 4 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 32 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 10 h | 10 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 52 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.8 g | 5.9 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | — | Glacier Blue, Midnight Black, Champagne Mist, Rosy Brown |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
