How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Clip Pro vs TAH8000E

Nothing CMF Clip Pro vs Philips TAH8000E

What CMF Clip Pro does better (1) and where TAH8000E wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Clip Pro
Nothing · 2026CMF Clip Pro
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ $85
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.4Score
5 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
5.4Sound6.1
5.6Noise control & calls6.1
2.3Battery8.4

Why is CMF Clip Pro better than TAH8000E?

  1. Weight6 g vs 260 g43.9×

Why is TAH8000E better than CMF Clip Pro?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 70 h7×
  2. Active noise cancellingNo · CMF Clip Pro: Yes
  3. Driver size10.8 mm vs 40 mm3.7×
  4. Battery capacity60 mAh vs 1,100 mAh18.3×
  5. Microphones4 vs 5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10.8 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones45
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h70 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity60 mAh1,100 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h10 min → 8 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight6 g260 g
Protection ratingIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Dust protection (IP)5—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare