How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Buds 2 Plus vs TAT3000

Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus vs Philips TAT3000

What CMF Buds 2 Plus does better (1) and where TAT3000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus
Nothing · 2025CMF Buds 2 Plus
9.5Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT3000
Philips · 2026TAT3000
2 advantages≈ $40
8.3Noise control & calls9.3

Why is CMF Buds 2 Plus better than TAT3000?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is TAT3000 better than CMF Buds 2 Plus?

  1. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
  2. Charging time4.5 h vs 3 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12 mm—
Sensitivity—106 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h—
Battery life with ANC33 h—
Total with charging case62 h—
Battery capacity53 mAh—
Charging time4.5 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4,5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.46
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.5 g—
Protection ratingIP55IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare