How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Buds 2 Plus vs TAA6709BK/00

Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus vs Philips TAA6709BK/00

What CMF Buds 2 Plus does better (6) and where TAA6709BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus
Nothing · 2025CMF Buds 2 Plus
9.4Score
6 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA6709BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6709BK/00
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $55
8.4Noise control & calls4.2
9.0Battery4.4

Why is CMF Buds 2 Plus better than TAA6709BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  2. Battery life14 h vs 7 h2×
  3. Total with charging case62 h vs 28 h2.2×
  4. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  5. LDACYes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  6. Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%

Why is TAA6709BK/00 better than CMF Buds 2 Plus?

  1. Battery capacity53 mAh vs 58 mAh+9%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—150 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—91 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h7 h
Battery life with ANC33 h—
Total with charging case62 h28 h
Battery capacity53 mAh58 mAh
Charging time4.5 h—
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4,5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.5 g—
Protection ratingIP55IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Colours—Black, Red
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare