vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.2Battery8.8
Why is FoKus H-ANC better than WF-1000XM4?
- Battery life13 h vs 12 h+8%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
Why is WF-1000XM4 better than FoKus H-ANC?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · FoKus H-ANC: Yes
- LDACNo · FoKus H-ANC: Yes
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 13 h | 12 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.3 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
