vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.0Battery5.0
Why is FALCON ANC better than RZ-S50W?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · RZ-S50W: No
- Battery life8.5 h vs 7.5 h+13%
- Highest frequency42,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.1×
- aptXYes · RZ-S50W: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
Why is RZ-S50W better than FALCON ANC?
RZ-S50W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 42,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8.5 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
