vs
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
2.6Battery3.3
Why is HPRF010BK better than FALCON MAX?
HPRF010BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FALCON MAX better than HPRF010BK?
- Active noise cancellingNo · HPRF010BK: Yes
- Battery life4 h vs 5.5 h+38%
- Charging time4.5 h vs 1.5 h3×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Hybrid |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 5.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4.5 h |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 4.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
