How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. M-298 vs ICON ANC

Muse M-298 vs Skullcandy ICON ANC

What M-298 does better (1) and where ICON ANC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Muse M-298
Muse · 2025M-298
9.5Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy ICON ANC
Skullcandy · 2025ICON ANC
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $85
9.2Noise control & calls7.8
8.4Battery7.4

Why is M-298 better than ICON ANC?

  1. Battery life66 h vs 60 h+10%

Why is ICON ANC better than M-298?

  1. Weight240 g vs 225 g+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Muse M-298Muse M-298≈ $759.5
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity107 dB98 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life66 h60 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight240 g225 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Foldable—Yes
Colours—True Black, Bone/Orange, Realtree APX Black/Orange, Primer
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare