vs
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
2.4Battery3.6
Why is VerveBuds 250 better than Enco Free2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Enco Free2 better than VerveBuds 250?
- Active noise cancellingNo · VerveBuds 250: Yes
- Total with charging case15 h vs 30 h2×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 103 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 15 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 48 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
