Why is ROKR 300 better than SRS-XB100?
ROKR 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SRS-XB100 better than ROKR 300?
- Battery life12 h vs 16 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Speaker channels | — | Mono |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Stereo | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 16 h |
| Mains powered | No | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 274 g |
| Width | — | 95 mm |
| Height | — | 76 mm |
| Depth | — | 95 mm |
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
