vs
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is Moto JR300 better than TAK4206?
Moto JR300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAK4206 better than Moto JR300?
- Battery life24 h vs 28 h+17%
- Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | 83 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | 28 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
