vs
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is Moto JR300 better than TAH2000?
Moto JR300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAH2000 better than Moto JR300?
- Battery life24 h vs 26 h+8%
- Driver size30 mm vs 40 mm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | 123 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | 26 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 200 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 6 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
