How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Moto Buds Bass vs TAT2139

Motorola Moto Buds Bass vs Philips TAT2139

What Moto Buds Bass does better (2) and where TAT2139 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Moto Buds Bass
Motorola · 2025Moto Buds Bass
7.3Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $25
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
7.5Battery4.2

Why is Moto Buds Bass better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
  2. Total with charging case43 h vs 28 h+54%

Why is TAT2139 better than Moto Buds Bass?

  1. Driver size12.4 mm vs 13 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $256.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12.4 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h7 h
Total with charging case43 h28 h
Battery capacity—50 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight51 g—
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare