vs
7.2Noise control & calls5.5
7.5Battery5.1
Why is Moto Buds Bass better than CMF Buds 2a?
- Battery life9 h vs 8 h+12%
- Total with charging case43 h vs 36 h+21%
Why is CMF Buds 2a better than Moto Buds Bass?
CMF Buds 2a has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 12.4 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 43 h | 36 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 51 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
