vs
6.7Battery2.4
5.4Build & features6.8
Why is moto buds 2 plus better than HP-C28BTF?
- Battery life9 h vs 3.5 h2.6×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is HP-C28BTF better than moto buds 2 plus?
- Charging time3 h vs 1.5 h2×
- Earbud weight (each)4.6 g vs 3 g+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6.1 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 90 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 3.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 60 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 1.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.6 g | 3 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
