3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold better than R1 1.0?
- Weight260 g vs 386 g+48%
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+14%
Why is R1 1.0 better than 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold?
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 5 Hz3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | 110 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 386 g |
| Colours | — | Brown, Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsSony WH-1000XM6vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsJBL Tour One M3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsBeats 360vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsBowers & Wilkins Px7 S3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold