vs
Why is P64150 better than S800D 3.1.2ch Lifestyle Ultra Slim Soundbar in?
P64150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is S800D 3.1.2ch Lifestyle Ultra Slim Soundbar in better than P64150?
- Channel count2.1 vs 3.1+49%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Speaker channels | 2.1 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 2.1 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| DTS:X | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Voice assistant built in | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | unter dem Fernseher, an der Wand | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion P64150vsULTIMEA Apollo S60vs
Medion P64150vsBlaupunkt LSA 2500vs
Medion P64150vsSony HTA9M2.CEK Home Theatre System
vs
Sonos Arc UltravsSamsung S800D 3.1.2ch Lifestyle Ultra Slim Soundbar in
vsKlipsch flexus Core 100vsSamsung S800D 3.1.2ch Lifestyle Ultra Slim Soundbar in
vsKlipsch Flexus Core 200vsSamsung S800D 3.1.2ch Lifestyle Ultra Slim Soundbar in