vs
Why is Stockwell III better than TAMS60?
Stockwell III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAMS60 better than Stockwell III?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
- Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 76.2 mm | — |
| Output power | 127 W | — |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 54 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 40 h | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 20 min → 7 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Mains powered | — | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| Auracast | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,300 g | — |
| Width | 150 mm | — |
| Height | 181 mm | — |
| Depth | 72 mm | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 6 |
