How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Minor IV vs OpenWear Stereo

Marshall Minor IV vs Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo

What Minor IV does better (1) and where OpenWear Stereo wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Minor IV
Marshall · 2024Minor IV
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo
Xiaomi · 2024OpenWear Stereo
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $85
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
5.4Battery5.2
3.8Build & features2.4

Why is Minor IV better than OpenWear Stereo?

  1. Earbud weight (each)7.4 g vs 9.6 g+30%

Why is OpenWear Stereo better than Minor IV?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Minor IV: Yes
  2. Total with charging case30 h vs 38 h+28%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h7 h
Total with charging case30 h38 h
Charging time1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBCLHDC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.4 g9.6 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Wear detection (auto pause)Yes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare