How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Minor IV vs Method 360 ANC

Marshall Minor IV vs Skullcandy Method 360 ANC

What Minor IV does better (1) and where Method 360 ANC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Minor IV
Marshall · 2024Minor IV
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $100
vs
Skullcandy Method 360 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Method 360 ANC
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls5.6
5.4Battery8.1
3.8Build & features2.2

Why is Minor IV better than Method 360 ANC?

  1. Earbud weight (each)7.4 g vs 11 g+49%

Why is Method 360 ANC better than Minor IV?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Minor IV: Yes
  2. Battery life7 h vs 9 h+29%
  3. Total with charging case30 h vs 40 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity—97 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—4
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h9 h
Battery life with ANC—32 h
Total with charging case30 h40 h
Charging time1 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.4 g11 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Colours—Crazy Pink, Cement, Primer, Bone, Plasma, Future, True Black, Leopard
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Wear detection (auto pause)Yes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare