Why is Minor III better than TAT8506?
Minor III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT8506 better than Minor III?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Minor III: Yes
- Battery life5 h vs 8 h+60%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Total with charging case25 h vs 32 h+28%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Driver size12 mm vs 13 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 104 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 25 h | 32 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
