vs
7.1Noise control & calls7.9
7.9Battery7.5
8.7Connectivity6.1
Why is Milton A.N.C. better than Crusher 1080 ANC?
- Battery life80 h vs 60 h+33%
- Weight200 g vs 374 g+87%
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is Crusher 1080 ANC better than Milton A.N.C.?
- Driver size32 mm vs 36 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 36 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 36 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | 122 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 6 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 80 h | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 4 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 374 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Primer, Candy, Cement, True Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.vsSoundcore Space 2 Pro7.77.4vs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.vsVivo Headphones Studio7.78.1vs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.vsSennheiser HDR 275vs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.vsbeyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossenvs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.vsFiiO JT9 Over-Ear Planar-Magnetkopfhörer, offen