How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Milton A.N.C. vs RS 275

Marshall Milton A.N.C. vs Sennheiser RS 275

What Milton A.N.C. does better (4) and where RS 275 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Milton A.N.C.
Marshall · 2026Milton A.N.C.
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ $170
Higher score
vs
Sennheiser RS 275
Sennheiser · 2026RS 275
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $210
6.8Noise control & calls3.8
7.7Battery6.5

Why is Milton A.N.C. better than RS 275?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · RS 275: No
  2. Battery life80 h vs 50 h+60%
  3. LDACYes · RS 275: No
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is RS 275 better than Milton A.N.C.?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 6 Hz3.3×
  2. aptXNo · Milton A.N.C.: Yes
  3. Weight200 g vs 195 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity99 dB106 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Battery & charging
Battery life80 h50 h
Battery life with ANC50 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYesYes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight200 g195 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare