How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs ULT FIELD 3

Marshall Emberton III vs Sony ULT FIELD 3

What Emberton III does better (3) and where ULT FIELD 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
vs
Sony ULT FIELD 3
Sony · 2025ULT FIELD 3
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $110
5.1Sound6.1
9.6Battery7.9
8.2Build & features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Emberton IIIULT FIELD 3
160 × 6876.9256 × 11379
Emberton IIIULT FIELD 3Difference
Height68 mm113 mm−45 mm
Width160 mm256 mm−96 mm
Depth76.9 mm79 mm−2.1 mm
Weight670 g1,200 g−530 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Emberton III better than ULT FIELD 3?

  1. Battery life32 h vs 24 h+33%
  2. Weight670 g vs 1,200 g+79%
  3. Output power38 W vs 30 W+27%

Why is ULT FIELD 3 better than Emberton III?

  1. Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 20 Hz3.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT FIELD 3Sony ULT FIELD 3≈ $1108.2
Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm—
Output power38 W30 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h24 h
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight670 g1,200 g
Width160 mm256 mm
Height68 mm113 mm
Depth77 mm79 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare