How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs MONITOR III A.N.C.

Marshall Emberton III vs Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.

What Emberton III does better (2) and where MONITOR III A.N.C. wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ $140
vs
Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
Marshall · 2024MONITOR III A.N.C.
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
9.5Battery9.6
6.0Connectivity6.1

Why is Emberton III better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?

  1. Driver size50.8 mm vs 32 mm+59%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%

Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than Emberton III?

  1. Battery life32 h vs 100 h3.1×
  2. Weight670 g vs 250 g2.7×
  3. Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 20 Hz3.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size50.8 mm32 mm
Output power38 W—
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—35 Ω
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
StereoYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h100 h
Battery life with ANC—70 h
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Mains poweredNo—
Battery powered (portable)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYesYes
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight670 g250 g
Width160 mm—
Height68 mm—
Depth77 mm—
Protection ratingIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare