How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton II vs Woodland

Marshall Emberton II vs PURE Woodland

What Emberton II does better (3) and where Woodland wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton II
Marshall · 2022Emberton II
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
vs
PURE Woodland
PURE · 2023Woodland
7.8Score
0 advantages≈ $110
9.0Battery5.9
7.6Build & features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Emberton IIWoodland
160 × 6876174 × 130106
Emberton IIWoodlandDifference
Height68 mm130 mm−62 mm
Width160 mm174 mm−14 mm
Depth76 mm106 mm−30 mm
Weight700 g900 g−200 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Emberton II better than Woodland?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 14 h2.1×
  2. Output power20 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Weight700 g vs 900 g+29%

Why is Woodland better than Emberton II?

Woodland has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

PURE WoodlandPURE Woodland≈ $1107.8
Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm—
Output power20 W10 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency60 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h14 h
Battery capacity—5,000 mAh
Charging time3 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.1
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight700 g900 g
Width160 mm174 mm
Height68 mm130 mm
Depth76 mm106 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Colours—Green
Features
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare