How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton II vs Emberton III

Marshall Emberton II vs Marshall Emberton III

What Emberton II does better (1) and where Emberton III wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton II
Marshall · 2022Emberton II
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $130
vs
Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
4.6Sound5.1
8.9Battery9.6
7.6Build & features8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Emberton IIEmberton III
160 × 6876160 × 6876.9
Emberton IIEmberton IIIDifference
Height68 mm68 mm=
Width160 mm160 mm=
Depth76 mm76.9 mm−0.9 mm
Weight700 g670 g+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Emberton II better than Emberton III?

  1. Lowest frequency60 Hz vs 65 Hz+8%

Why is Emberton III better than Emberton II?

  1. Output power20 W vs 38 W+90%
  2. Battery life30 h vs 32 h+7%
  3. Weight700 g vs 670 g+4%
  4. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
  5. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size50.8 mm50.8 mm
Output power20 W38 W
Speaker channels2.02.0
Channel count22
Lowest frequency60 Hz65 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h32 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 4 h20 min → 6 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight700 g670 g
Width160 mm160 mm
Height68 mm68 mm
Depth76 mm77 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare