How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Acton III vs SRS-RA3000

Marshall Acton III vs Sony SRS-RA3000

What Acton III does better (1) and where SRS-RA3000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Acton III
Marshall · 2022Acton III
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $210
Higher score
vs
Sony SRS-RA3000
Sony · 2021SRS-RA3000
0 advantages≈ $220
Dimensions

Size comparison

Acton IIISRS-RA3000
260 × 170150146 × 247155
Acton IIISRS-RA3000Difference
Height170 mm247 mm−77 mm
Width260 mm146 mm+114 mm
Depth150 mm155 mm−5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Acton III better than SRS-RA3000?

  1. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 4.2+24%

Why is SRS-RA3000 better than Acton III?

SRS-RA3000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power60 W—
Speaker channelsStereoStereo
Lowest frequency45 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.24.2
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
LE AudioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARCYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Chromecast / Google Cast—Yes
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight2,850 g—
Width260 mm146 mm
Height170 mm247 mm
Depth150 mm155 mm
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare