vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
Monitor Reference 3AWoburn III
| Monitor Reference 3A | Woburn III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 335 mm | 317 mm | +18 mm |
| Width | 205 mm | 400 mm | −195 mm |
| Depth | 252 mm | 203 mm | +49 mm |
| Weight | 6,400 g | 7,450 g | −1,050 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Monitor Reference 3A better than Woburn III?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- aptXYes · Woburn III: No
- Weight6,400 g vs 7,450 g+16%
- Lowest frequency34 Hz vs 35 Hz+3%
Why is Woburn III better than Monitor Reference 3A?
Woburn III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 120 W |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | Stereo |
| Channel count | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 34 Hz | 35 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | No | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,400 g | 7,450 g |
| Width | 205 mm | 400 mm |
| Height | 335 mm | 317 mm |
| Depth | 252 mm | 203 mm |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx0 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | — |
