How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs TAK4200

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs Philips TAK4200

What Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h does better (3) and where TAK4200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h
7.7Score
3 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $30
9.2Noise control & calls6.0
5.3Battery5.6

Why is Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h better than TAK4200?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAK4200: No
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4200 better than Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 45 h+12%
  2. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $304.7
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h45 h
Battery capacity—300 mAh
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—129 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare