How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs TAH2000

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs Philips TAH2000

What Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h does better (3) and where TAH2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h
7.7Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH2000
Philips · 2025TAH2000
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $18
9.2Noise control & calls3.8
5.3Battery4.2

Why is Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h better than TAH2000?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAH2000: No
  2. Battery life40 h vs 26 h+54%
  3. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is TAH2000 better than Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h?

  1. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH2000Philips TAH2000≈ $184.1
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h26 h
Battery capacity—200 mAh
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare