vs
Why is SQM1 better than Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos?
SQM1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos better than SQM1?
- SubwooferNone vs Wireless subwoofer included
- Channel count2 vs 3.1+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 40 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 2 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | None | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 4 | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Voice assistant built in | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
LG SQM1vsPhilips TAB4208vs
LG SQM1vsSamsung HW-Q810GD/ZGvs
LG SQM1vsULTIMEA Apollo S60
vs
Sonos Arc UltravsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos
vsKlipsch Flexus Core 200vsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos
vsKlipsch flexus Core 100vsSamsung Wi-Fi Soundbar Q-Symphony 3.1.2ch Cinematic Dolby Atmos