vs
Why is SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0 better than HW-B400F/EN?
- Channel count5 vs 22.5×
- SubwooferWireless subwoofer included vs None
Why is HW-B400F/EN better than SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0?
HW-B400F/EN has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Speaker channels | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 5 | 2 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | None |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 4.2 |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 2,100 g |
| Width | — | 641 mm |
| Height | — | 66 mm |
| Depth | — | 107 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | — | Yes |
| Placement | — | vor dem Fernseher, an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Klipsch Flexus Core 300vsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0
vsBluesound Pulse Cinema MinivsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0
vsCreative Sound Blaster GS5vsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0
vsSamsung HW-QS710GF/ZGvsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0
vsSamsung HW-Q990F/ENvsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0
vsSamsung HW-B410GF/ZGvsLG SQM1 Bluetooth Compact All-In-One Soundbar 2.0