vs
9.7Sound8.3
Why is SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser Subwoofer better than A65K?
- Output power600 W vs 460 W+30%
- Channel count4.1 vs 3.1+31%
Why is A65K better than SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser Subwoofer?
A65K has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 600 W | 460 W |
| Speaker channels | 4.1 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 4.1 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| DTS:X | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,150 g |
| Width | 990 mm | 880 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony BRAVIA Theatre Bar 5vsLG SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser Subwoofer
vs
Loewe soundbar antares 80W Stereo, Air Motion MembranenvsLG SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser Subwoofer
vs
ULTIMEA Poseidon M100vsLG SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser Subwoofer
vs
LG SH5A 2.1 Soundbar 320W kabelloser SubwoofervsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200W
vs
Samsung HW-Q610GH/ZFvsTCL A65K
vs
Oakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsTCL A65K
