3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is KPH7 Wireless better than Moto JR300?
KPH7 Wireless has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Moto JR300 better than KPH7 Wireless?
- Battery life18 h vs 24 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 85 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 24 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
